Before you become officially employed, you need to sign an employment contract that binds you into an agreement. Signing a contract means that you will follow company policies and agree to the terms and conditions. Your probationary period is one of the provisions in the contract. But, what if you noticed that the probationary period is more than six months? Will you still consider your employment just and legal?

According to Article 281 of the Labor Code, "probationary employment shall not exceed six months from the date the employee started working, unless it is covered by an apprenticeship agreement stipulating a longer period."

Also, an employee who continues to work for the same company after the probationary period will be considered a regular employee. As a rule of thumb, the period of probation should only be limited to six months.

However, there are still some exceptions to the rule. This is when probationary employment is covered by an apprenticeship agreement, which in theory requires a longer period. Apprenticeship refers to an employment wherein the situation that an employee is engaged in is apprenticeable.

SECTION 6. Probationary employment.

(a) Where the work for which an employee has been engaged is learnable or apprenticeable in accordance with the standards prescribed by the Department of Labor, the probationary employment period of the employee shall be limited to the authorized learnership or apprenticeship period, whichever is applicable.

(b) Where the work is neither learnable nor apprenticeable, the probationary employment period shall not exceed six (6) months reckoned from the date the employee actually started working.

(c) The services of an employee who has been engaged on probationary basis may be terminated only for a just cause or when authorized by existing laws, or when he fails to qualify as a regular employee in accordance with reasonable standards prescribed by the employer.

(d) In all cases involving employees engaged on probationary basis, the employer shall make known to the employee the standards under which he will qualify as a regular employee at the time of his engagement.

If you have made a purchase of a parcel of land and found out that the contract has not been notarized, can the contract be considered invalid? The notarization of a contract is not required to prove its validity. As stated in Article 1356 of the Civil Code, contracts are deemed obligatory and it should meet the essential requisites that will prove its validity.

Art. 1356. Contracts shall be obligatory, in whatever form they may have been entered into, provided all the essential requisites for their validity are present. However, when the law requires that a contract be in some form in order that it may be valid or enforceable, or that a contract be proved in a certain way, that requirement is absolute and indispensable. In such cases, the right of the parties stated in the following article cannot be exercised.

It has also been specified under Article 1318 that notarization is not one of the requirements for preparing a contract.

Art. 1318. There is no contract unless the following requisites concur:

    (1) Consent of the contracting parties;

    (2) Object certain which is the subject matter of the contract;

    (3) Cause of the obligation which is established.

However, the notarization converts a contract into a public document. While it is not required, it is suggested that contracts involving land must be notarized as specified under Article 1358 of the Civil Code.

Art. 1358. The following must appear in a public document:

(1) Acts and contracts which have for their object the creation, transmission, modification or extinguishment of real rights over immovable property; sales of real property or of an interest therein a governed by Articles 1403, No. 2, and 1405;

(2) The cession, repudiation or renunciation of hereditary rights or of those of the conjugal partnership of gains;

(3) The power to administer property, or any other power which has for its object an act appearing or which should appear in a public document, or should prejudice a third person;

(4) The cession of actions or rights proceeding from an act appearing in a public document.

If you will undergo the registration process, the deed of sale should be notarized according to Section 112 of the Property Registration Decree.

Section 112. Forms in conveyancing. The Commissioner of Land Registration shall prepare convenient blank forms as may be necessary to help facilitate the proceedings in land registration and shall take charge of the printing of land title forms.

Deeds, conveyances, encumbrances, discharges, powers of attorney and other voluntary instruments, whether affecting registered or unregistered land, executed in accordance with law in the form of public instruments shall be registerable: Provided, that, every such instrument shall be signed by the person or persons executing the same in the presence of at least two witnesses who shall likewise sign thereon, and shall acknowledged to be the free act and deed of the person or persons executing the same before a notary public or other public officer authorized by law to take acknowledgment. Where the instrument so acknowledged consists of two or more pages including the page whereon acknowledgment is written, each page of the copy which is to be registered in the office of the Register of Deeds, or if registration is not contemplated, each page of the copy to be kept by the notary public, except the page where the signatures already appear at the foot of the instrument, shall be signed on the left margin thereof by the person or persons executing the instrument and their witnesses, and all the ages sealed with the notarial seal, and this fact as well as the number of pages shall be stated in the acknowledgment. Where the instrument acknowledged relates to a sale, transfer, mortgage or encumbrance of two or more parcels of land, the number thereof shall likewise be set forth in said acknowledgment.

If you have already made your last will and testament and decided to make some changes, do you need to follow the same requirements as the old will? In most cases, creating a new will can still be considered invalid if it does not meet the conditions under Article 830. Creating a new will does not automatically revoke the old will.

The old will can be still be considered operative if there is no valid revocation of a will by a subsequent will. This means that the subsequent will should comply with the formal requirements in terms of executing it. The maker of the will must have testamentary capacity and the subsequent will should contain express revocatory clause which shows incompatibility with the old will.

You must clearly express your intention to replace your old will. It should also specify your intention to revoke it. The subsequent will must also be probated by Court as this is still part of the requirement.

SUBSECTION 6. - Revocation of Wills and Testamentary Dispositions

Art. 828. A will may be revoked by the testator at any time before his death. Any waiver or restriction of this right is void. (737a)

Art. 829. A revocation done outside the Philippines, by a person who does not have his domicile in this country, is valid when it is done according to the law of the place where the will was made, or according to the law of the place in which the testator had his domicile at the time; and if the revocation takes place in this country, when it is in accordance with the provisions of this Code. (n)

Art. 830. No will shall be revoked except in the following cases:

    (1) By implication of law; or

    (2) By some will, codicil, or other writing executed as provided in case of wills; or

    (3) By burning, tearing, cancelling, or obliterating the will with the intention of revoking it, by the testator himself, or by some other person in his presence, and by his express direction. If burned, torn, cancelled, or obliterated by some other person, without the express direction of the testator, the will may still be established, and the estate distributed in accordance therewith, if its contents, and due execution, and the fact of its unauthorized destruction, cancellation, or obliteration are established according to the Rules of Court. (n)

Art. 831. Subsequent wills which do not revoke the previous ones in an express manner, annul only such dispositions in the prior wills as are inconsistent with or contrary to those contained in the latter wills. (n)

Art. 832. A revocation made in a subsequent will shall take effect, even if the new will should become inoperative by reason of the incapacity of the heirs, devisees or legatees designated therein, or by their renunciation. (740a)

Art. 833. A revocation of a will based on a false cause or an illegal cause is null and void. (n)

Art. 834. The recognition of an illegitimate child does not lose its legal effect, even though the will wherein it was made should be revoked.

The digital era, where anyone can bask in the glory of anonymity, has proven that thoughts indeed travel faster than the speed of light. What used to be a cosmic phenomenon has now been a virtual phenomenon. Everyone yearns to enjoy freedom of speech, but when is too much, too much?

Now that the Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012 or the Republic Act 10175 has been strengthened, it has also tightened its grip on people violating the law. Andre Philippe LaFlamme, an American national has been found guilty of online libel due to his caustic remarks against his colleague in 2014.

LeFlamme's Facebook posts from 2014 through 2016 pointed to one direction: defaming plaintiff Quennie Samane. A P120,000 bail has already been set to grant LaFlamme's temporary freedom. The posts contained derogatory remarks that tainted the plaintiff's good reputation.

One post showed a photograph of Samane with the heading "I'd do anything for money." Aside from the case of online libel LaFlamme has yet to face another complaint due to threatening other employees. 

The prosecutor will file a warrant of arrest after LaFlamme failed to submit his counter-affidavit.

The violation that LaFlamme committed falls under Article 353, 354 and 355 of the Revised Penal Code.

ART. 353. Definition of libel. — A libel is a public and malicious imputation of a crime, or of a vice or defect, real or imaginary, or any act, omission, condition, status or circumstance tending to cause the dishonor, discredit, or contempt of a natural or juridical person, or to blacken the memory of one who is dead.

ART. 354. Requirement for publicity. — Every defamatory imputation is presumed to be malicious, even if it be true, if no good intention and justifiable motive for making it is shown, except in the following cases:

A private communication made by any person to another in the performance of any legal, moral, or social duty; and

A fair and true report, made in good faith, without any comments or remarks, of any judicial, legislative, or other official proceedings which are not of confidential nature, or of any statement, report, or speech delivered in said proceedings, or of any other act performed by public officers in the exercise of their functions.

ART. 355. Libel by means of writings or similar means. — A libel committed by means of writing, printing, lithography, engraving, radio, phonograph, painting, theatrical exhibition, cinematographic exhibition, or any similar means, shall be punished by prisión correccional in its minimum and medium periods or a fine ranging from 200 to 6,000 pesos, or both, in addition to the civil action which may be brought by the offended party.

The case is also in relation to the Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012

(4) Libel. — The unlawful or prohibited acts of libel as defined in Article 355 of the Revised Penal Code, as amended, committed through a computer system or any other similar means which may be devised in the future.

As a solo parent, you are required to juggle multiple responsibilities that sometimes, your own needs have to take a backseat.

You become a solo parent when you assume responsibility of the head of the family due to abandonment, death or disappearance.  While it can be difficult to wear many hats, you know for a fact that you and your siblings need to survive. Is a solo parent entitled to labor benefits?

Republic Act No. 8972  or Solo Parents' Welfare Act of 2000

Section 4. Criteria for Support. – Any solo parent whose income in the place of domicile falls below the poverty threshold as set by the National Economic and Development Authority (NEDA) and subject to the assessment of the DSWD worker in the area shall be eligible for assistance: Provided, however, That any solo parent whose income is above the poverty threshold shall enjoy the benefits mentioned in Sections 6, 7 and 8 of this Act.

Section 5. Comprehensive Package of Social Development and Welfare Services. – A comprehensive package of social development and welfare services for solo parents and their families will be developed by the DSWD, DOH, DECS, CHED, TESDA, DOLE, NHA and DILG, in coordination with local government units and a nongovernmental organization with proven track record in providing services for solo parents.

The DSWD shall coordinate with concerned agencies the implementation of the comprehensive package of social development and welfare services for solo parents and their families. The package will initially include:

(a) Livelihood development services which include trainings on livelihood skills, basic business management, value orientation and the provision of seed capital or job placement.

(b) Counseling services which include individual, peer group or family counseling. This will focus on the resolution of personal relationship and role conflicts.

(c) Parent effectiveness services which include the provision and expansion of knowledge and skills of the solo parent on early childhood development, behavior management, health care, rights and duties of parents and children.

(d) Critical incidence stress debriefing which includes preventive stress management strategy designed to assist solo parents in coping with crisis situations and cases of abuse.

(e) Special projects for individuals in need of protection which include temporary shelter, counseling, legal assistance, medical care, self-concept or ego-building, crisis management and spiritual enrichment.

Section 6. Flexible Work Schedule. – The employer shall provide for a flexible working schedule for solo parents: Provided, That the same shall not affect individual and company productivity: Provided, further, That any employer may request exemption from the above requirements from the DOLE on certain meritorious grounds.

Section 7. Work Discrimination. – No employer shall discriminate against any solo parent employee with respect to terms and conditions of employment on account of his/her status.

Section 8. Parental Leave. – In addition to leave privileges under existing laws, parental leave of not more than seven (7) working days every year shall be granted to any solo parent employee who has rendered service of at least one (1) year.

Section 9. Educational Benefits. – The DECS, CHED and TESDA shall provide the following benefits and privileges:

(1) Scholarship programs for qualified solo parents and their children in institutions of basic, tertiary and technical/skills education; and

(2) Nonformal education programs appropriate for solo parents and their children.

The DECS, CHED and TESDA shall promulgate rules and regulations for the proper implementation of this program.

Section 10. Housing Benefits. – Solo parents shall be given allocation in housing projects and shall be provided with liberal terms of payment on said government low-cost housing projects in accordance with housing law provisions prioritizing applicants below the poverty line as declared by the NEDA.

Section 11. Medical Assistance. – The DOH shall develop a comprehensive health care program for solo parents and their children. The program shall be implemented by the DOH through their retained hospitals and medical centers and the local government units (LGUs) through their provincial/district/city/municipal hospitals and rural health units (RHUs).

If you and your siblings have inherited a land from your parents and all of you are named as co-owners, there will come a time when one of you will decide to divide the property as a way of claiming the portion you co-owned.

In this case, siblings must know the provisions of  partitioning the property. Problems arise due to an undivided property. While this can be a classic example of sibling rivalry, such conflict may end up in court if not settled. Article 494 to 501 of the Civil Code of the Philippines provides the provision with regard to the partition of the property you co-owned.

Article 494-501 of the Civil Code of the Philippines

Art. 494. No co-owner shall be obliged to remain in the co-ownership. Each co-owner may demand at any time the partition of the thing owned in common, insofar as his share is concerned.

Nevertheless, an agreement to keep the thing undivided for a certain period of time, not exceeding ten years, shall be valid. This term may be extended by a new agreement.

A donor or testator may prohibit partition for a period which shall not exceed twenty years.

Neither shall there be any partition when it is prohibited by law.

No prescription shall run in favor of a co-owner or co-heir against his co-owners or co-heirs so long as he expressly or impliedly recognizes the co-ownership. (400a)

Art. 495. Notwithstanding the provisions of the preceding article, the co-owners cannot demand a physical division of the thing owned in common, when to do so would render it unserviceable for the use for which it is intended. But the co-ownership may be terminated in accordance with Article 498. (401a)

Art. 496. Partition may be made by agreement between the parties or by judicial proceedings. Partition shall be governed by the Rules of Court insofar as they are consistent with this Code. (402)

Art. 497. The creditors or assignees of the co-owners may take part in the division of the thing owned in common and object to its being effected without their concurrence. But they cannot impugn any partition already executed, unless there has been fraud, or in case it was made notwithstanding a formal opposition presented to prevent it, without prejudice to the right of the debtor or assignor to maintain its validity. (403)

Art. 498. Whenever the thing is essentially indivisible and the co-owners cannot agree that it be allotted to one of them who shall indemnify the others, it shall be sold and its proceeds distributed. (404)

Art. 499. The partition of a thing owned in common shall not prejudice third persons, who shall retain the rights of mortgage, servitude or any other real rights belonging to them before the division was made. Personal rights pertaining to third persons against the co-ownership shall also remain in force, notwithstanding the partition. (405)

Art. 500. Upon partition, there shall be a mutual accounting for benefits received and reimbursements for expenses made. Likewise, each co-owner shall pay for damages caused by reason of his negligence or fraud. (n)

Art. 501. Every co-owner shall, after partition, be liable for defects of title and quality of the portion assigned to each of the other co-owners.

Can self-employed Social Security System (SSS) members enjoy the same retirement benefits as members employed by companies?

The good news is, the retirement benefits are not only granted to SSS members who are employed because it is also given to self-employed members. This is according to Republic Act No. 8282 or the Social Security Law of 1997 .

What does it take to be qualified for retirement benefits?

A self-employed will only be qualified for these retirement benefits if they have made a payment of at least one hundred twenty (120) monthly contributions prior to the semester of the member's retirement. The benefits will be enjoyed the moment you reach the age of sixty years and have already ceased being self-employed, or you have reached the age of sixty-five years.

You also have an option to receive your first eighteen monthly pensions in lump sum discounted at preferential rate of interest and this will be determined by the SSS. However if the self-employed member failed to pay the required contributions upon reaching sixty years of age, the lump sum that will be received will be based on the total contributions already paid.

In the event of self-employed member's death, primary beneficiaries will be entitled to receive a monthly pension if the member had already been receiving the retirement benefit. Your secondary beneficiaries will be the ones to receive the lump sum if you pass away within sixty months from the start of your monthly pension, provided you do not have primary beneficiaries.

Additional details about the benefits and contributions of self-employed members are stipulated in Republic Act. No. 8282:

"SEC. 9-A. Compulsory Coverage of the Self-Employed. - Coverage in the SSS shall also be compulsory upon such self-employed persons as may be determined by the Commission under such rules and regulations as it may prescribe, including but not limited to the following:

"1. All self-employed professionals;

"2. Partners and single proprietors of businesses;

"3. Actors and actresses, directors, scriptwriters and news correspondents who do not fall within the definition of the term "employee" in Section 8 (d) of this Act;

"4. Professional athletes, coaches, trainers and jockeys; and

"5. Individual farmers and fishermen.

"Unless otherwise specified herein, all provisions of this Act applicable to covered employees shall also be applicable to the covered self-employed persons.

"SEC. 10. Effective Date of Coverage. - Compulsory coverage of the employer shall take effect on the first day of his operation and that of the employee on the day of his employment: Provided, That the compulsory coverage of the self-employed person shall take effect upon his registration with the SSS.

"SEC. 11. Effect of Separation from Employment. - When an employee under compulsory coverage is separated from employment, his employer's contribution on his account and his obligation to pay contributions arising from that employment shall cease at the end of the month of separation, but said employee shall be credited with all contributions paid on his behalf and entitled to benefits according to the provisions of this Act. He may, however, continue to pay the total contributions to maintain his right to full benefit.

"SEC. 11-A. Effect of Interruption of Business or Professional Income. - If the self-employed realizes no income in any given month, he shall not be required to pay contributions for that month. He may, however, be allowed to continue paying contributions under the same rules and regulations applicable to a separated employee member: Provided, That no retroactive payment of contributions shall be allowed other than as prescribed under Section Twenty-two-A hereof.

"SEC. 12. Monthly Pension. - (a) The monthly pension shall be the highest of the following amounts:

"(1) The sum of the following:

"(i) Three hundred pesos (P300.00; plus

"(ii) Twenty percent (20%) of the average monthly salary credit; plus

"(iii) Two percent (2%) of the average monthly salary credit for each credited year of service in excess of ten (10) years; or

"(2) Forth percent (40%) of the average monthly salary credit; or

"(3) One thousand pesos (P1,000.00): Provided, That the monthly pension shall in no case be paid for an aggregate amount of less than sixty (60) months.

"(b) Notwithstanding the preceding paragraph, the minimum pension shall be One thousand two hundred pesos (P1,200.00) for members with at least ten (10) credited years of service and Two thousand four hundred pesos (P2,400.00) for those with twenty (20) credited years of service.

"SEC. 12-A. Dependents' Pension. - Where monthly pension is payable on account of death, permanent total disability or retirement, dependents' pension equivalent to ten percent (10%) of the monthly pension or Two hundred fifty pesos (P250.00), whichever is higher, shall also be paid for each dependent child conceived on or before the date of the contingency but not exceeding five (5), beginning with the youngest and without substitution: Provided, That where there are legitimate or illegitimate children, the former shall be preferred.

SEC. 12-B. Retirement Benefits. - (a) A member who has paid at least one hundred twenty (120) monthly contributions prior to the semester of retirement and who: (1) has reached the age of sixty (60) years and is already separated from employment or has ceased to be self-employed; or (2) has reached the age of sixty-five (65) years, shall be entitled for as long as he lives to the monthly pension: Provided, That he shall have the option to receive his first eighteen (18) monthly pensions in lump sum discounted at a preferential rate of interest to be determined by the SSS.

"(b) A covered member who is sixty (60) years old at retirement and who does not qualify for pension benefits under paragraph (a) above, shall be entitled to a lump sum benefit equal to the total contributions paid by him and on his behalf: Provided, That he is separated from employment and is not continuing payment of contributions to the SSS on his own.

"(c) The monthly pension shall be suspended upon the reemployment or resumption of self-employment of a retired member who is less than sixty-five (65) years old. He shall again be subject to Section Eighteen and his employer to Section Nineteen of this Act.

"(d) Upon the death of the retired member, his primary beneficiaries as of the date of his retirement shall be entitled to receive the monthly pension: Provided, That if he has no primary beneficiaries and he dies within sixty (60) months from the start of his monthly pension, his secondary beneficiaries shall be entitled to a lump sum benefit equivalent to the total monthly pensions corresponding to the balance of the five-year guaranteed period, excluding the dependents' pension.

"(e) The monthly pension of a member who retires after reaching age sixty (60) shall be the higher of either: (1) the monthly pension computed at the earliest time he could have retired had he been separated from employment or ceased to be self-employed plus all adjustments thereto; or (2) the monthly pension computed at the time when he actually retires.

If there's something strange, in your neighborhood.  Who ya gonna call? Ghostbusters! Kidding aside, you cannot turn a blind eye on neighbors crying for help especially if their life is at stake.

An blunt example would be an abusive husband beating his hapless spouse. The lights were already out and you could hear nothing but crickets serenading in deathly still night. Your eyelids were already heavy and about to fall into the oblivion of sleep. You were about to be caught by paralysis called sleep, when you heard a shout match. It was too disturbing to ignore. Satisfying your curious nature, you got up and checked where the noise came from.

It was from your neighbor. The couples were engaging in a bad-tempered argument. The wife was silenced as the husband started to throw a series of punches. You could see a glimpse of their squabble from a far. The wife was crying helplessly in dire need of immediate help. As a concerned neighbor, you immediately went to the 'barangay' officials in your village to ask for assistance only to be turned down. Your request fell on deaf ears because the officials told you that they were not in the position to intervene because the matter should be between the married couple only. However, it is the duty of 'barangay' officials to heed your request under Section 30 of Republic Act 9262.

SECTION 30. Duties of Barangay Officials and Law Enforcers. – Barangay officials and law enforcers shall have the following duties:

(a) respond immediately to a call for help or request for assistance or protection of the victim by entering the necessary whether or not a protection order has been issued and ensure the safety of the victim/s;

(b) confiscate any deadly weapon in the possession of the perpetrator or within plain view;

(c) transport or escort the victim/s to a safe place of their choice or to a clinic or hospital;

(d) assist the victim in removing personal belongs from the house;

(e) assist the barangay officials and other government officers and employees who respond to a call for help;

(f) ensure the enforcement of the Protection Orders issued by the Punong Barangay or the courts;

(g) arrest the suspected perpetrator wiithout a warrant when any of the acts of violence defined by this Act is occurring, or when he/she has personal knowledge that any act of abuse has just been committed, and there is imminent danger to the life or limb of the victim as defined in this Act; and

(h) immediately report the call for assessment or assistance of the DSWD, social Welfare Department of LGUs or accredited non-government organizations (NGOs).

Any barangay official or law enforcer who fails to report the incident shall be liable for a fine not exceeding Ten Thousand Pesos (P10,000.00) or whenever applicable criminal, civil or administrative liability.

What should you do if you are unable to pay your hospital bills? Does the hospital administrator have the right to detain a patient for non-payment?

Getting sick is now considered a luxury because of the expenses that it incurs once you get hospitalized. It puts a dent in your wallet as you need to pay for the hospitalization bills. When you are unprepared for this type of emergency situation, it might seem difficult to get out of it without facing the serious consequences especially if it involves money.

There are many stories involving patients who are prohibited to leave the hospital premises unless they settle the unpaid hospital bill. Patients are left with no choice but to follow the rules. However, there is a better way to settle matters such as executing a promissory note. This should be secured by a guarantee of a co-maker or a mortgage.

This action is in accordance with the Republic Act No. 9439.

AN ACT PROHIBITING THE DETENTION OF PATIENTS IN HOSPITALS AND MEDICAL CLINICS ON GROUNDS OF NONPAYMENT OF HOSPITAL BILLS OR MEDICAL EXPENSES

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the Philippines in Congress assembled:

SECTION 1. It shall be unlawful for any hospital or medical clinic in the country to detain or to otherwise cause, directly or indirectly, the detention of patients who have fully or partially recovered or have been adequately attended to or who may have died, for reasons of nonpayment in part or in full of hospital bills or medical expenses.

SEC. 2. Patients who have fully or partially recovered and who already wish to leave the hospital or medical clinic but are financially incapable to settle, in part or in full, their hospitalization expenses, including professional fees and medicines, shall be allowed to leave the hospital or medical clinic, with a right to demand the issuance of the corresponding medical certificate and other pertinent papers required for the release of the patient from the hospital or medical clinic upon the execution of a promissory note covering the unpaid obligation. The promissory note shall be secured by either a mortgage or by a guarantee of a co-maker, who will be jointly and severally liable with the patient for the unpaid obligation. In the case of a deceased patient, the corresponding death certificate and other documents required for interment and other purposes shall be released to any of his surviving relatives requesting for the same: Provided, however, That patients who stayed in private rooms shall not be covered by this Act.

SEC. 3. Any officer or employee of the hospital or medical clinic responsible for releasing patients, who violates the provisions of this Act shall be punished by a fine of not less than Twenty thousand pesos (P20,000.00), but not more than Fifty thousand pesos (P50,000.00), or imprisonment of not less than one month, but not more than six months, or both such fine and imprisonment, at the discretion of the proper court.

SEC. 4. The Department of Health shall promulgate the necessary rules and regulations to carry out the provisions of this Act.

Cleaner air, healthier people.

If my memory serves me right, several laws have already been implemented to minimize the growing number of cigarette smokers in the country. In 2013, a law that raises tobacco taxes was signed and in 2014, the Philippines has signed into a law requiring tobacco manufacturers to display graphic health warnings on cigarettes packs. Aside from which, manufacturers are also required to display gruesome images of smoking's harmful effects. These laws aim to promote healthier people and cleaner air.

It is no secret that many individuals have already smoked their way to lung cancer, respiratory diseases and eventual death because of the deleterious effects of smoking. It has been estimated that an average of 240 Filipinos are dying on a daily basis due to smoking-related diseases.

This year, a law which bans smoking nationwide will be signed sometime this month. In the Philippines, Davao is the first city to implement smoking ban. Penalties for violating the anti-smoking law in Davao includes a fine of 5,000 Philippine peso or four months in prison.

To prove that smoking ban is strictly implemented in Davao,  President Duterte, then mayor of Davao City taught a man who refused to stop smoking a hard lesson. Duterte gave the man two options and one of which was to eat the cigarette. In relation to the implementation of No-Smoking Law, the Dapartment of Health (DOH) is also seeking amendment of Republic Act 9211 or the Tobacco Regulation Act of 2003.

Republic Act 9211

SECTION 6. Designated Smoking and Non-smoking Areas.—In all enclosed places that are open to the general public, private workplaces and other places not covered under the preceding section, where smoking may expose a person other than the smoker to tobacco smoke, the owner, proprietor, operator, possessor, manager or administrator of such places shall establish smoking and non-smoking areas. Such areas may include a designated smoking area within the building, which may be in an open space or separate area with proper ventilation, but shall not be located within the same room that has been designated as a non-smoking area.

All designated smoking areas shall have at least one (1) legible and visible sign posted, namely “SMOKING AREA” for the information and guidance of all concerned. In addition, the sign or notice posted shall include a warning about the health effects of direct or secondhand exposure to tobacco smoke. Non-Smoking areas shall likewise have at least one (1) legible and visible sign, namely: “NON-SMOKING AREA” or “NO SMOKING.”